Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> -static char *get_head_description(void)
> -{
> - struct strbuf desc = STRBUF_INIT;
> - struct wt_status_state state;
> - memset(&state, 0, sizeof(state));
> - wt_status_get_state(&state, 1);
> - if (state.rebase_in_progress ||
> - state.rebase_interactive_in_progress)
> - strbuf_addf(&desc, _("(no branch, rebasing %s)"),
> - state.branch);
> - else if (state.bisect_in_progress)
> - strbuf_addf(&desc, _("(no branch, bisect started on %s)"),
> - state.branch);
> - else if (state.detached_from) {
> - /* TRANSLATORS: make sure these match _("HEAD detached at ")
> - and _("HEAD detached from ") in wt-status.c */
> - if (state.detached_at)
> - strbuf_addf(&desc, _("(HEAD detached at %s)"),
> - state.detached_from);
> - else
> - strbuf_addf(&desc, _("(HEAD detached from %s)"),
> - state.detached_from);
> - }
> - else
> - strbuf_addstr(&desc, _("(no branch)"));
> - free(state.branch);
> - free(state.onto);
> - free(state.detached_from);
> - return strbuf_detach(&desc, NULL);
> -}
> -
Hmph, the name used to be a good one within the context of
implementation of "git branch" command, but I have to wonder if it
is a specific enough name in the global context of the entire
project. I also wondered if this sits better in wt-status.c;
doesn't "git status" do something similar?
For now, this should do, as I do not think of anything better.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html