Re: fsck missing dangling commits that are candidate heads?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Sergio Callegari <scallegari <at> arces.unibo.it> writes:

 
> Many thanks! I was quite sure I was missing something...
> At least I am in good company since the fsck man page does not mention the 
> logs 
> 
> Then... is there any shorthand for finding candidate branch-heads (i.e. for
> having something like fsck without looking at the logs) ?
> 

I mean, so that git lost-found can take advantage of it... in fact git gc is
surely doing the right thing by considering reflogs, but probably git lost-found
should not (at least wrt its documentation this script appears to be not in its
best shape right now).

Sergio 




-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]