Re: GSoC 2016 | Proposal | Incremental Rewrite of git bisect

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 5:10 PM, Christian Couder
<christian.couder@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 11:15 AM, Pranit Bauva <pranit.bauva@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> - you will add an option to "git bisect--helper" to perform what the
>>> git-bisect.sh function did, and
>>> - you will create a test script for "git bisect--helper" in which you
>>> will test each option?
>>
>> I had very initially planned to do this. But Matthieu pointed out that
>> it would be much better to use the existing test suite rather than
>> creating one which can lead to less coverage.
>
> Ok, then perhaps:
>
> - you will add tests to existing test scripts, so that each "git
> bisect--helper" option is (indirectly) tested.
Yes. I will mention this in the proposal also. Thanks for reminding.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]