Re: [PATCH] api-parse-options.txt: document OPT_CMDMODE()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 9:37 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Pranit Bauva <pranit.bauva@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> OPT_CMDMODE() was introduced in the release of 1.8.5 which makes the use
>> of subcommands in the form of arguments a lot cleaner and easier.
>> ---
>
> Sign-off?

Will include this.

>>  Documentation/technical/api-parse-options.txt | 6 ++++++
>>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/technical/api-parse-options.txt b/Documentation/technical/api-parse-options.txt
>> index 5f0757d..8130d26 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/technical/api-parse-options.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/technical/api-parse-options.txt
>> @@ -231,6 +231,12 @@ There are some macros to easily define options:
>>       pass the command-line option, which can be specified multiple times,
>>       to another command.
>>
>> +`OPT_CMDMODE(short, long, &int_var, description, enum_val)`::
>> +     Introduce an option for subcommands. It is useful when you want to use
>> +     the command with a particular sub command only and ignore other sub
>> +     commands it has. It will set `int_var` to enum_val if the argument is
>> +     invoked.
>> +
>
> Sorry, but I do not get what "when you want to... ignore other sub
> command it has" wants to say.

What I meant by this statement is that (your example), let's say we
have "add", "remove" and "edit" sub commands. Now the user has to pick
between the three. He cannot choose more than 1 from these.

> CMDMODE is a mechanism to actively notice when multiple "operation
> mode" options that specify mutually incompatible operation modes are
> given and error out without the user of parse_options() to implement
> that mutual exclusion herself.  That is, if you have 'add', 'remove'
> and 'edit' operation modes, with OPT_BOOL(), you would have to say:
>
>         options[] = {
>                 OPT_BOOL('a', "add", &add, ...),
>                 OPT_BOOL('r', "remove", &remove, ...),
>                 OPT_BOOL('e', "edit", &edit, ...),
>                 ...
>         };
>         parse_options(ac, av, prefix, options, ...);
>
>         if (!!add + !!remove + !!edit > 1)
>                 die("at most one add/remove/edit can be used at a time");
>
>         if (add)
>                 do_add();
>         if (remove)
>                 do_remove();
>         if (edit)
>                 do_edit();
>
> but with CMDMODE, you can do:
>
>         options[] = {
>                 OPT_BOOL('a', "add", &mode, ...),
>                 OPT_BOOL('r', "remove", &mode, ...),
>                 OPT_BOOL('e', "edit", &mode, ...),
>                 ...
>         };
>         parse_options(ac, av, prefix, options, ...);
>
>         switch (mode) {
>         case 'a': do_add(); break;
>         case 'r': do_remove(); break;
>         case 'e': do_edit(); break;
>                 ...
>         }
>
> and parse_options notices that "mode" is shared across these three
> options, and implements the mutual-exclusion itself.

Thanks for taking time to explain all the details behind it. I can
include these bits in the documentation. :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]