Re: [PATCH 4/4] mingw: skip some tests in t9115 due to file name issues

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2016-03-22 18.43, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> These two tests wanted to write file names which are incompatible with
> Windows' file naming rules.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@xxxxxx>

Is there a chance to squeeze in a precondition for HFS under Mac OS ?
> -test_expect_success UTF8 'svn.pathnameencoding=cp932 new file on dcommit' '
> +test_expect_success UTF8,!MINGW 'svn.pathnameencoding=cp932 new file on dcommit' '
+test_expect_success UTF8,!MINGW,!UTF8_NFD_TO_NFC

>  	LC_ALL=$a_utf8_locale &&
>  	export LC_ALL &&
>  	neq=$(printf "\201\202") &&
> @@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ test_expect_success UTF8 'svn.pathnameencoding=cp932 new file on dcommit' '
>  '
>  
>  # See the comment on the above test for setting of LC_ALL.
> -test_expect_success 'svn.pathnameencoding=cp932 rename on dcommit' '
> +test_expect_success !MINGW 'svn.pathnameencoding=cp932 rename on dcommit' '
And the same protection for HFS here.

Question: Why do we need a UTF8 protection in #11, but not in #12 ?



I just tested t9115 under german cygwin, passes.

http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/288827
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]