Re: git-index-pack really does suck..

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Tue, 3 Apr 2007, Shawn O. Pearce wrote:
> 
> So even with --paranoid (aka what we have now) index-pack still
> should be faster than unpack-objects for any sizeable transfer,
> and is just as "safe".

I agree 100% that index-pack is much much MUCH better than unpack-objects 
ever was, so ..

> If its the missing-object lookup that is expensive, maybe we should
> try to optimize that.  We do it enough already in other parts of
> the code...

Well, for all other cases it's really the "object found" case that is 
worth optimizing for, so I think optimizing for "no object" is actually 
wrong, unless it also speeds up (or at least doesn't make it worse) the 
"real" normal case.

		Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]