Re: Forgotten declaration of function path_name() in revision.h?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 07:05:49PM +0100, Petr Stodulka wrote:

> according to commit 9831e92 (merge) there is maybe by mistake kept declaration
> of function path_name() in revision.h, whose definition was removed
> and isn't used in git anymore.

Yes, this should have been part of de1e67d (list-objects: pass full
pathname to callbacks, 2016-02-11), but I missed it.

The patch itself looks fine to me (though it probably makes more sense
to point to de1e67d than the merge).

Note also that:

> ======================================================================
> From ae72c8f9085b3b7bd84f94f90ff5b0416db59d67 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Petr Stodulka <pstodulk@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 18:51:53 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] remove obsoleted function path_name() from header file
>  revision.h

It makes things easier on the maintainer if you format your patch such
that "git am" can apply it directly. Use scissors like:

-- >8 --

to separate the patch from anything that should not go into the commit
message (rather than "=====..." as you have here).

Drop the "From " line which says nothing (it is an mbox separator, but
we are already inside a message).

The rest of the headers do not hurt, but are generally redundant with
what is in your email header (though in this case, the Subject is
different, so you would want to retain that).

-Peff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]