On Mar 09, 2016, at 09:29 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote: >Let me understand the use case. You have $HOME/.git that governs >everything under $HOME, but there are parts of $HOME/, such as >$HOME/projects/*, that will never be controled by $HOME/.git? Correct. >Two obvious reactions are: > > - hopefully $HOME/.gitignore covers these non-git parts by having > entries like '/projects/'; this should not affect the behaviour > of CEILING though. Correct. In this case, $HOME/.gitignore has `projects` so `git status` etc. in $HOME does the right thing. > - typing "git status" inside $HOME/projects/ does not make much > sense in the first place. True, and normally I wouldn't do this explicitly, but it comes up because I have a bash prompt that shows me the status of the current directory ($GIT_PS_*) so even when I just cd to ~/projects I see status for $HOME. >I _think_ the "are we in a Git-managed working tree and if so, then >where is the .git directory?" discovery works like this: [...] >So setting $HOME/projects as one of the elements in the CEILING list >would not stop us going up if you are actually at $HOME/projects, >but we would stop if you started from $HOME/projects/python. And indeed, that works great. >This somehow sounds a bit inconsistent to me, but I say "a bit >inconsistent" because "Why do we give different answer to 'is >$HOME/projects/python governed by $HOME/.git?' depending on where we >start the discovery process?" is a non-argument (i.e. that is not >the question CEILING is answering). > >I have a feeling that we must have done that for a reason. It may >be interesting to see what breaks in t1504 if the above logic is >updated to stop when you start at a CEILING (unlike the current code >where it stops only when you start below a CEILING). That would be interesting; it seems like it would solve my use case. Cheers, -Barry
Attachment:
pgplAhUYOqFNj.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature