Re: [PATCH v4 0/7] replacing strbuf_getline_lf() by strbuf_getline()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 03/09/2016 01:39 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Moritz Neeb <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
>> how to deal with patches during the v2.8.0 rc freeze? Will they wait on
>> the mailing list until the feature release cycle is finished?
> 
> Because people are expected to stop getting distracted by new
> features and no-op clean-up changes and instead to focus on helping
> find and fix regressions that have been introduced since v2.7.x
> series during the pre-release period, you may not get review
> comments unless your patches are really important.
> 

Ok, I was not sure, sorry for the noise generated. Will resend post-release.

> To participate in regression hunting or not is your choice.

Say, I would like to participate. This might be a very naive question,
but: What is the "workflow" in regression hunting?

There is this known "git status"-regression, where you seem to be at
least close to a decision:

	http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/288228/focus=288444

What I can imagine could lead towards finding regessions, though maybe a
bit aimless: Go through the list of changes/patches that are supposed to
be included in v2.8.0 and confirm they are working as expected. This
would be like a post-review.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]