On vr, 2016-03-04 at 03:56 -0500, Jeff King wrote: > ? Those are just guesses, but if we are tickling a bug in perl's parser, > this might avoid them. I also wondered when "/r" appeared. It was in > 5.14, so you're presumably good there. The "use" statement at the top of > the script says "5.008", so perhaps we should be writing it out longhand > anyway (that version is "only" 5 years old, so I suspect there are still > systems around with 5.12 or older). Knowing the system Christian is testing on, I think the problem is that the tests are actually being run against perl 5.10, which RHEL 6 ships as system perl. As that's still a supported OS, writing tests in a form compatible with it would be a good thing :) -- Dennis Kaarsemaker http://www.kaarsemaker.net -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html