Re: [PATCH] Change type of signed int flags to unsigned

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 8:24 AM, Saurav Sachidanand
<sauravsachidanand@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> “pattern” and “exclude” are two structs defined in attr.c and dir.h
> respectively. Each contains a field named “flags” of type int, that
> takes on values from the set of positive integers {1, 4, 8, 16}
> enumerated through the macro EXC_FLAG_*.
>
> That the most significant bit (used to store the sign) of these two
> fields is not used in any special way, is observed from the fact
> that, the flags fields (accessed within attr.c, dir.c, and
> builtin/check-ignore.c) is either checked for it's value using the &
> operator (e.g.: flags & EXC_FLAG_NODIR), or assigned a value of 0
> first and then assigned any one of {1, 4, 8, 16} using the | operator
> (e.g.: flags |= EXC_FLAG_NODIR). Hence, change the type of flags
> to unsigned in both structs.
>
> Furthermore, flags is passed by reference to the function
> parse_exclude_pattern defined in dir.c, which accepts an “int *” type
> for the flags argument. To avoid converting between pointers to
> different types, change type of the flags argument to “unsigned *”.

If you follow Duy's suggestion[1] of checking for additional
sign-conversion warnings and fixing the additional instances, then
there will be a bit more fallout than this one function. In that case,
you might consider changing this paragraph to be a bit more generic;
for instance, perhaps something like this:

    These "flags" fields are passed to several functions, so convert
    the functions to accept 'unsigned' rather than 'int', as well.

> While we’re at it, document the flags field of exclude to explicitly
> state the values it’s supposed to take on.

Good.

> Signed-off-by: Saurav Sachidanand <sauravsachidanand@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---

Right here below the "---" line is where you'd write commentary about
the patch. In this case, you should mention that this is a GSoC
microproject.

As an aid to reviewers, also provide a link to the previous version
(like this [2]), and explain what changed since that attempt. In this
case, you refined the commit message and used bare "unsigned" in the
patch rather than "unsigned int".

The patch itself looks reasonable (though it would look better if
additional fixes were made as suggested by Duy[1]).

[1]: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/286821/focus=286900
[2]: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/286821

>  attr.c | 2 +-
>  dir.c  | 4 ++--
>  dir.h  | 4 ++--
>  3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/attr.c b/attr.c
> index 086c08d..679e13c 100644
> --- a/attr.c
> +++ b/attr.c
> @@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ struct pattern {
>         const char *pattern;
>         int patternlen;
>         int nowildcardlen;
> -       int flags;              /* EXC_FLAG_* */
> +       unsigned flags;         /* EXC_FLAG_* */
>  };
>
>  /*
> diff --git a/dir.c b/dir.c
> index 552af23..d36fda7 100644
> --- a/dir.c
> +++ b/dir.c
> @@ -459,7 +459,7 @@ int no_wildcard(const char *string)
>
>  void parse_exclude_pattern(const char **pattern,
>                            int *patternlen,
> -                          int *flags,
> +                          unsigned *flags,
>                            int *nowildcardlen)
>  {
>         const char *p = *pattern;
> @@ -500,7 +500,7 @@ void add_exclude(const char *string, const char *base,
>  {
>         struct exclude *x;
>         int patternlen;
> -       int flags;
> +       unsigned flags;
>         int nowildcardlen;
>
>         parse_exclude_pattern(&string, &patternlen, &flags, &nowildcardlen);
> diff --git a/dir.h b/dir.h
> index 3ec3fb0..e34df5e 100644
> --- a/dir.h
> +++ b/dir.h
> @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ struct exclude {
>         int nowildcardlen;
>         const char *base;
>         int baselen;
> -       int flags;
> +       unsigned flags;         /* EXC_FLAG_* */
>
>         /*
>          * Counting starts from 1 for line numbers in ignore files,
> @@ -244,7 +244,7 @@ extern struct exclude_list *add_exclude_list(struct dir_struct *dir,
>  extern int add_excludes_from_file_to_list(const char *fname, const char *base, int baselen,
>                                           struct exclude_list *el, int check_index);
>  extern void add_excludes_from_file(struct dir_struct *, const char *fname);
> -extern void parse_exclude_pattern(const char **string, int *patternlen, int *flags, int *nowildcardlen);
> +extern void parse_exclude_pattern(const char **string, int *patternlen, unsigned *flags, int *nowildcardlen);
>  extern void add_exclude(const char *string, const char *base,
>                         int baselen, struct exclude_list *el, int srcpos);
>  extern void clear_exclude_list(struct exclude_list *el);
> --
> 2.7.1.339.g0233b80
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]