Duy Nguyen <pclouds@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 5:34 AM, Stefan Beller <sbeller@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> In case the length of the buffer is zero, we do not need to call the
>> fwrite system call as a performance improvement.
>
> fwrite is a libc call, not system call. Are you sure it always calls
> write() (assuming buffering is off)?
I do not think so, but I suspect that the patch misstates its
rationale (I said I get uncomfortable every time I see a function
that takes size and nelem separately used by a caller that can
potentially pass nleme=0, when I wondered it it is OK that no caller
of this funtion checks its return value).
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>
>> This applies on top of v17 for origin/sb/submodule-parallel-update.
>>
>> In case there are other reasons for origin/sb/submodule-parallel-update
>> to need a reroll I'll squash it in. But as this is a pure performance
>> optimization in a case we are not running into with that series and that
>> series is clashing with Davids refs backend series, I figure we may not
>> want to have a reroll for this fix alone.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Stefan
>>
>>
>> strbuf.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/strbuf.c b/strbuf.c
>> index 71345cd..5f6da82 100644
>> --- a/strbuf.c
>> +++ b/strbuf.c
>> @@ -397,7 +397,7 @@ ssize_t strbuf_read_once(struct strbuf *sb, int fd, size_t hint)
>>
>> ssize_t strbuf_write(struct strbuf *sb, FILE *f)
>> {
>> - return fwrite(sb->buf, 1, sb->len, f);
>> + return sb->len ? fwrite(sb->buf, 1, sb->len, f) : 0;
>> }
>>
>>
>> --
>> 2.7.2.374.ga5f0819.dirty
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html