Re: [PATCH] refs: document transaction semantics

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2016-02-25 at 12:34 -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> David Turner <dturner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > I thought it would be better in the api docs, since it's a design
> > decision that all backends should follow.
> 
> Makes sense; as this describes an already available API, it
> shouldn't have to wait for the remainder of your series and can just
> go to 'master' (or even to 'maint' if we wanted to), right?

Yes.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]