On di, 2016-02-23 at 10:49 +0100, Stefan Frühwirth wrote: > On 23.02.2016 at 06:02 Jeff King wrote: > > > Let's wait and see how many "please don't"s we hear, perhaps, > > > before > > > deciding to go 3.? > > > > I'm guessing we won't see much either way. Even Stefan, the > > original > > reporter, does not seem to actively be using it, but rather > > relaying a > > report. > > I _am_ actively using it. Maybe I was unclear on that topic. I'm in > favour of keeping it, because this means I don't have to rewrite > Chris' > Code in order to be able to use the Python library that uses merge- > tree > (Acidfs). But as a sensible human being I want what's best in the > long > run. I leave that up to you as I have no way of assessing that. > > So that's a "please don't" leave the code as-is but provide a > (transitional) solution that fixes the reported bug and has the best > chances of not causing any more headaches :) I am also actively using it. It's the only way (I know of) of trying to preview a merge result without attempting the actual merge, which is useful in some of my scripts. -- Dennis Kaarsemaker www.kaarsemaker.net -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html