On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 7:15 AM, Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Yeah, the existence of HTTPS (and the fact that the same URL can be both > anonymous and authenticated) is nice. Unfortunately, git-over-https is > not as efficient as the other protocols, because it's not asynchronously > bi-directional. It would probably be relatively simple to make a > "gits://" protocol, but I think it would be more interesting still if we > could do git-over-websockets, to get the ubiquity benefits of HTTP. That's interesting. I didn't realize that even the smart protocol was not as efficient as HTTP, but that makes sense. git+ws:// would indeed be quite nice! > Darn printed books. I thought the Ministry of Truth was supposed to take > care of keeping our facts up to date. :-P -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html