Re: whither merge-tree?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 10:35:34PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> > I stopped short of dropping the create_virtual_base function in the
> > first patch, for reasons explained there. But if we were to do so, I
> > suspect we could deprecated and eventually drop "apply --no-add", too.
> 
> Thanks.  I think the "virtual" stuff started its life outside
> sh-setup but later was moved there for p4merge.  The log message for
> 4549162e (mergetools/p4merge: create a base if none available,
> 2013-03-13) seems to indicate that using an empty file does not work
> well over there as you suspected, so unfortunately we cannot lose it
> just yet.

Oh, indeed. I did find that commit in my git-blaming, but failed to
actually read it carefully. :)

With that, yeah, I agree that we cannot drop the virtual-base thing, and
my 3 patches are fine as-is.

-Peff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]