Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Tests and fixes for merge-recursive rename options

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Felipe Gonçalves Assis <felipeg.assis@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

>> As I said, I am reluctant to take the 25%/50%/75% tests in their
>> current form.  Let me take the first one and a half of the last one
>> (i.e. excluding the test) for now.
>>
>> Thanks.
>
> Ok, should I post a new version of the patch without the tests while I
> rework them or does that mean that you have already filtered them out
> locally?

I already have and queued them tentatively as 

    c443d39 merge-recursive: find-renames resets threshold
    83837ec merge-strategies.txt: fix typo

but they haven't been merged to 'next', so it is up to you whether
you rebuild the remainder on top of c443d39 or redo these 5 patches
altogether (just tell me to drop these two if you go the latter
route).

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]