Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] merge-recursive: option to disable renames

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 8:11 PM, Felipe Gonçalves Assis
<felipeg.assis@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> No more renames option. rename-threshold enables renames.

Can you add some tests? Off the top of my head, I'd expect to see at
least three new tests:

1. --no-renames works as expected
2. last wins in "--no-renames --rename-threshold=x"
3. last wins in "--rename-threshold=x --no-renames"

> A second optional patch is included, teaching merge-recursive to take
> "find-renames[=<n>]" as well, for consistency.

Tests should also accompany this change. A couple obvious ones:

1. --find-rename=x works as synonym for --rename-threshold=x
2. --fine-rename (without "=x") works as expected

Thanks.

> Felipe Gonçalves Assis (2):
>   merge-recursive: option to disable renames
>   merge-recursive: more consistent interface
>
>  Documentation/merge-strategies.txt | 14 ++++++++++++--
>  merge-recursive.c                  | 12 +++++++++++-
>  merge-recursive.h                  |  1 +
>  3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.7.1.288.gfad33a8
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]