On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 08:03:57AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Michael J Gruber <git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > >> Does this mean that I should warn in the release notes that some > >> existing users might get their expectation broken but we are going > >> ahead anyway because we think most people read left to right and > >> then top down? I am OK with saying that--I just wanted to make sure > >> we know that it is what we are doing. > > > > I would claim that anyone who notices the difference in buffer numbering > > would be positively surprised. > > Thanks. I, being a non-user of vim, was wondering if people who had > their own user-defined commands (macros? and possibly short-cut keys > to invoke them) built around the old (and odd) numbering need to > adjust--in which case we may need to forewarn. > > > In any case, the buffer numbering is not the same (it is local remote > > base merge) but it doesn't matter in this case because only one window > > is displayed, so there is no visual association. > > OK, thanks. Sorry for not noticing this thread earlier. The change and the rationale sound good to me. FWIW, Acked-by: David Aguilar <davvid@xxxxxxxxx> ciao, -- David -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html