Re: [PATCH v2 03/25] transport-helper.c: do not send null option to remote helper

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 6:22 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy  <pclouds@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>
> This is even more strange.  Are the current callers broken and some
> sends value==NULL for an option that is not is_bool, resulting in
> a call to quote_c_style() with NULL?  I somehow find it hard to
> believe as that would lead to an immediate segfault.
>
> Assuming that no current caller passes NULL to value when is_bool is
> not in effect, there needs an explanation why future new callers may
> need to do so.  An alternative for a valueless option could be to
> send "option name\n" instead of the usual "option name value\n", but
> without such an explanation, readers cannot tell why not sending
> anything about "name", which is what this patch chooses to implement,
> is a better idea.

The source is backfill_tags() which, in future, resets some transport
options back to defaults. The current set_option() in there only deals
with booleans or number (depth). But in future it resets deepen-since,
which is a string.

I think the main reason is, we do not have a way to reset (or unset) a
transport option. Should I keep this commit and explain about this, or
have a new transport API to reset option?
-- 
Duy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]