Re: no luck with colors for branch names in gitk yet

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 12:25 PM, Philip Oakley <philipoakley@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: "Britton Kerin" <britton.kerin@xxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Someone suggested using color.branch.upstream, I tried like this and
>> variants
>>
>> [color "branch"]
>>  local = red bold
>>  upstream = red bold
>>
>> Doesn't seem to matter what I put in for upstream, including invalid
>> colors, gitk just ignores it and does the dark green for local
>> branches
>> --
>
> Alternate, try
> https://github.com/oumu/mintty-color-schemes/blob/master/base16-mintty/base16-default.minttyrc
> (or any of the other colour schemes) and copy them into your .minttyrc file
> (works for me on g4w : git version 2.7.0.windows.1 )

I'm on linux so I think mintty is not an option.  Also, I'm a little
surprised in affects the rendering of branch tags in gitk, I would
have thought that would be an X or window system thing.

Britton
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]