Re: [PATCH 0/6] post-strbuf_getline cleanups

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:

> As promised, here are the "how about this on top" patches that came out
> of the discussion for the "strbuf_getline" series in:
>
>   http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.msysgit/21773/focus=284001

Thanks for following up.

> As I looked further at some of the option-parsing cleanups, I realized
> that some of them are more than cleanups; we're actually fixing bizarre
> behavior and segfaults.
>
>   [1/6]: give "nbuf" strbuf a more meaningful name
>   [2/6]: checkout-index: simplify "-z" option parsing
>   [3/6]: checkout-index: handle "--no-prefix" option
>   [4/6]: checkout-index: handle "--no-index" option
>   [5/6]: checkout-index: disallow "--no-stage" option
>   [6/6]: apply, ls-files: simplify "-z" parsing
>
> -Peff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]