Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] worktree: new repo extension to manage worktree behaviors

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Max Kirillov <max@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> The worktree feature has been used by several people
> already (me included), and do far the only issue which
> requires change in repository layout is the config
> separation. Isn't it enough to be confident?

One lessor key phrase above is "so far", I think, and another one
you forgot to use is s/which requires/that we know &/, which to me
is a more serious one.  IOW, I do think it is premature for us to
say that that config split issue is the only thing, or to say that
the issue is best solved by changing the layout in the way being
discussed; the multiple-worktree feature needs more lab experience
for us to gain confidence.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]