Re: [PATCH] convert: legitimately disable clean/smudge filter with an empty override

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 24 Jan 2016, at 16:06, Torsten Bögershausen <tboegi@xxxxxx> wrote:

> On 24.01.16 13:22, larsxschneider@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> From: Lars Schneider <larsxschneider@xxxxxxxxx>
> Some minor nits inside: 
>> 
>> A clean/smudge filter can be disabled if set to an empty string. 
> "set to an empty string" refers to "git config" (in opposite to the
> filter as such, which is specified in .gitattributes.
> Does it make sense to write 
> "git config filter.XXX.smudge ''" or so ?

I am not sure I get what you want here. Would this work for you?

The clean/smudge filter commands (filter.XYZ.smudge and filter.XYZ.clean)
can be disabled if set to an empty string. However, Git will still consider the 
empty string as command which results in a error message per processed 
file.


> 
>> However,
>> Git will try to run the empty string as command which results in a error
>> message per processed file.
>> 
>> Teach Git to consider an empty clean/smudge filter as legitimately disabled
>> and do not print an error message.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Lars Schneider <larsxschneider@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> convert.c             |  4 ++--
>> t/t0021-conversion.sh | 14 ++++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/convert.c b/convert.c
>> index 814e814..58af965 100644
>> --- a/convert.c
>> +++ b/convert.c
>> @@ -786,7 +786,7 @@ int convert_to_git(const char *path, const char *src, size_t len,
>> 	struct conv_attrs ca;
>> 
>> 	convert_attrs(&ca, path);
>> -	if (ca.drv) {
>> +	if (ca.drv && ca.drv->clean && strlen(ca.drv->clean)) {
>> 		filter = ca.drv->clean;
>> 		required = ca.drv->required;
>> 	}
>> @@ -835,7 +835,7 @@ static int convert_to_working_tree_internal(const char *path, const char *src,
>> 	struct conv_attrs ca;
>> 
>> 	convert_attrs(&ca, path);
>> -	if (ca.drv) {
>> +	if (ca.drv && ca.drv->smudge && strlen(ca.drv->smudge)) {
>> 		filter = ca.drv->smudge;
>> 		required = ca.drv->required;
>> 	}
>> diff --git a/t/t0021-conversion.sh b/t/t0021-conversion.sh
>> index 718efa0..56e385c 100755
>> --- a/t/t0021-conversion.sh
>> +++ b/t/t0021-conversion.sh
>> @@ -252,4 +252,18 @@ test_expect_success "filter: smudge empty file" '
>> 	test_cmp expected filtered-empty-in-repo
>> '
>> 
>> +test_expect_success 'disable filter with empty override' '
>> +	git config filter.disable.smudge false &&
>> +	git config filter.disable.clean false &&
>> +
>> +	echo "*.disable filter=disable" >.gitattributes &&
>> +
>> +	echo test >test.disable &&
>> +	git -c filter.disable.clean= add test.disable 2>err &&
>> +	! test -s err &&
> How about 
> test_cmp /dev/null err
> to make debugging easier ?
Right. Although I would probably go with Eric's suggestion and use "test_must_be_empty".

That being said, I copied "! test -s" from the "filter large file" test in this file (added with 0b6806b).
How does the list handle these cases? Should I add another commit to replace "! test -s" there, 
too?

Thanks,
Lars--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]