Re: Submodule object store

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 27 Mar 2007, Martin Waitz wrote:

On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 04:28:28PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Martin Waitz <tali@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

To make purge and fsck work we have the hard requirement that it
must be possible to list all objects which belong to one submodule.

I understand you would want to separate the ref namespace, but I
still do not see why you would want to have a separate object
store, laid out in a funny way.  Unless you are thinking about
using rsync to transfer object store, that is.

I want to be able to list all objects which are not reachable in the
object store, without traversing all submodules at the same time.
The only way I can think of to achieve this is to have one separate
object store per submodule and then do the traversal per submodule.

why do you want to optimize for the relativly rare fsck function rather then the more common read functions (which would benifit from shareing object that are identical between projects)?

David Lang
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]