Hi Junio, On Sun, 24 Jan 2016, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@xxxxxx> writes: > > > From: Karsten Blees <blees@xxxxxxx> > > > > The SVN library does not seem to support symlinks, even if symlinks are > > enabled in MSYS2 and Git. Use 'cp' instead of 'ln -s'. > > > > This partially fixes t/t9100-git-svn-basic.sh > > > > Signed-off-by: Karsten Blees <blees@xxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@xxxxxx> > > --- > > t/t9100-git-svn-basic.sh | 9 ++++++++- > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > For the purpose of SVN test, is it important that foo.link is a link > to foo? I am wondering what would be the fallout from making this > change without "only on MINGW do this". (I originally sent the following response as a reply to 13/19 by mistake.) Your comment made me inspect the entire t9100 again, wondering why things work when we copy the contents instead of symlinking them. And you know what, even if I could have sworn that I verified for every patch in this series that it is actually necessary to pass the test suite, it is *not* necessary. So I backed it out and it won't be part of v2 anymore. Ciao, Dscho -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html