Re: Understanding version 4 packs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Nicolas Pitre <nico@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Maybe simply 3 bytes might be a good compromise too.  I doubt a single 
> pack is ever to contain 4G paths since it is limited to 4G _objects_ in 
> the first place.

16M paths is also a lot. ;-)
 
> BTW Shawn there is no need to store the number of tree records at the 
> beginning of the tree object since that can be deduced directly from the 
> object size stored in the object header.

Doh.  Yes, of course.

-- 
Shawn.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]