On Sunday, January 10, 2016 01:25:42 PM Philip Oakley wrote:
> From: "Stephen P. Smith" <ischis2@xxxxxxx>
> > Add support for negative pattern matching in <at> ^{/<pattern>} style
>
> Has this become mangled by replacing the '@' with ' <at> ' ?
It looks like the cover letter got mangled. I will fix after I get any comments
on the patches themselves.
>
> When I look at the update to revisions.txt it doesn't look like its touching
> the '@' description.
> Is this '@^' a new (for the documenation) combination. Or has the example
> confused me?
>
> > revision specifiers. So now you can find the first commit whose message
> > doesn't match a pattern, complementing the existing positive matching.
> > e.g.:
> >
> > $ git rebase -i <at> ^{/!-^WIP}
> >
> > My use-case is in having a "work, work, work, rebase, push"-style
> > workflow, which generates a lot of "WIP foo" commits. While rebasing is
> > usually handled via "git rebase -i origin/master", occasionally I will
> > already have several "good, but not yet ready to push" commits hanging
> > around while I finish work on related commits. In these situations, the
> > ability to quickly "git diff <at> ^{/!-^WIP}" to get an overview of all
> > changes "since the last one I was happy with", can be useful.
> >
> > This is the second version of the patch series. The previous attempt
> > used the notation <at> ^{/!WIP}, rather than <at> ^{/!-WIP}, so the
> > "modifier"
> > was the '!' character. Now, '!' is taken as an indicator that the
> > pattern is to be interpreted differently, and '-' is taken as an
> > indicator of how it is to be interpreted differently. This follows
> > recent discussion with "Junio C Hamano" <gitster <at> pobox.com> and
> > much-less
> > recent discussion archived at:
> >
> > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/40460/focus=40477
> >
> > In summary, '!' is to be used as an "escape hatch", for further
> > extension of the "name commit by pattern" functionality. Theorised future
> > extensions indicated things like "what was to be searched",
> > e.g.: <at> ^{/!(a=author)}. With only two interpretations of the '!'
> > leader, for now (including the '!!' literal notation), adding such a
> > verbose form, such as ' <at> ^{/!(negative)foo}', seemed inappropriate at
> > this
> > time. In the event that such verbose forms are ever implemented, this new
> > form may act as a shorthand, for a basic case.
> >
> > Will Palmer (2):
> > test for '!' handling in rev-parse's named commits
> > object name: introduce '^{/!-<negative pattern>}' notation
> >
> > Documentation/revisions.txt | 11 +++++-----
> > sha1_name.c | 20 ++++++++++++-----
> > t/t1511-rev-parse-caret.sh | 53
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > 3 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >
> --
> Philip
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html