Am 09.01.2016 um 18:21 schrieb Karthik Nayak:
(Note: The alphabetical-ness of the branch names is reversed, which
seems logical given my original sort was -committerdate. A
--sort=refname looks like this.
refs/heads/!@#$% -> Tue Jan 3 17:00:51 2012 +1100
refs/heads/!@#% -> Tue Jan 3 17:04:06 2012 +1100
refs/heads/% -> Tue Jan 3 17:00:51 2012 +1100
refs/heads/@#$% - >Tue Jan 3 17:00:51 2012 +1100
refs/heads/@#% -> Tue Jan 3 17:00:51 2012 +1100
That's probably more correct too.)
Best regards,
Bryan Turner
This is correct as per the patch, But I'm wondering if this is desired.
I.E when sorting in reverse order should the fallback (alphabetical sort)
also be in reverse order?
IMO, the fallback sorting should be in reverse order only when the user
explicitley asked for reverse order. Just because committer date implies
some "reverse" ordering should not imply that refs with the same
committer date should also be listed in reverse alphabetical order.
-- Hannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html