Re: Working towards a common review format for git

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 2:23 PM, Richard Ipsum
<richard.ipsum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> You know what would probably also be a good idea would be to spec out
>> the entire format in a standalone document. That way when Gerrit
>> doesn't have something implemented, it's clear that Gerrit is wrong,
>> not that it's trying to fork the format.
>
> I think that would be good, I could attempt to write a spec for the format
> and post it here for review? I expect I'll want to work a little more on
> perl-notedb before I do that though.

Sure. I don't want to necessarily make more work for you, but it's
probably a good exercise to have someone write a spec who did not also
write the first implementation :)

You may post it here but you would probably get more feedback on
repo-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]