Re: Detecting redundant commits

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On January 4, 2016 10:00:26 PM CST, Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

>Or do you mean commits that, when applied, we find turn out to have
>empty changes (e.g., because we have a set of commits that have
>different patch-ids, but do roughly the same thing)? I don't think you
>can find that with a straight end-to-end diff. You have try to apply
>and
>then look at the result. I think we already catch that case (see
>--allow-empty), though I think the only options are "preserve" or
>"abort", not "silently skip" (and it sounds like the latter is what you
>would want).

This.  I see where --allow-empty is handled in prepare_to_commit but it is not so easy to skip the commit at that point due to state changes.  I was trying to avoid going into commit at all by determining ahead of time whether the commit would become empty.  Any ideas?

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]