Re: [PATCH 1/3] t6050-replace: make failing editor test more robust

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] t6050-replace: make failing editor test more robust
From: SZEDER Gábor <szeder@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2016 11:48:06 +0100
Cc: Christian Couder <chriscool@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1451990010-15458-1-git-send-email-szeder@ira.uka.de>
User-agent: Horde Application Framework 5


Erm, subject says "[PATCH 1/3]", but I messed up, this is a standalone patch.


Gábor
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

References:
- [PATCH 1/3] t6050-replace: make failing editor test more robust
  - From: SZEDER Gábor

Prev by Date: [PATCH 1/3] t6050-replace: make failing editor test more robust
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Add a test for subtree rebase that loses commits
Previous by thread: [PATCH 1/3] t6050-replace: make failing editor test more robust
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/3] t6050-replace: make failing editor test more robust
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel Development] [Gcc Help] [IETF Annouce] [DCCP] [Netdev] [Networking] [Security] [V4L] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Fedora Users]