On Wednesday, December 30, 2015 03:29:09 PM Junio C Hamano wrote: > "Stephen P. Smith" <ischis2@xxxxxxx> writes: > > > The gitweb cgi script provides users an easy way to browse your > > -project's files and history without having to install Git; see the file > > -gitweb/INSTALL in the Git source tree for instructions on setting it up. > > +project's revisions, file contents and logs without having to install > > +Git. Features like RSS/Atom feeds and blame/annotation details may > > Thanks. Was there a reason to rewrite "files and history" into > "revisions, file contents and logs"? The words "revisions" and > "logs" both refer to the same thing and "history" is a good word for > it already, so I am puzzled. No strong objection, though... > [Re-worded my explanation.] "revisions, file contents and logs was in the second sentence of the first patch. "files and history" was in the first sentence of the first patch. When I was getting rid of the duplication I decided that "revisions, file contents and logs" was a little more explicit and so decided to keep that wording. As a secondary reason that is the wording in gitweb.txt. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html