On 2015-12-29 08.09, Christian Couder wrote:
> It is not a good idea to compare kernel versions and disable
> the untracked cache if it changes as people may upgrade and
> still want the untracked cache to work. So let's just
> compare work tree locations to decide if we should disable
> it.
OK with that.
>
> Also it's not useful to store many locations in the ident
> field and compare to any of them. It can even be dangerous
> if GIT_WORK_TREE is used with different values. So let's
> just store one location, the location of the current work
> tree.
I don't think I fully agree in all details.
The list is there to distinguish between different clients when sharing
a Git workspace over a network to different clients:
A file system is exported from Linux to Linux via NFS,
including a Git workspace)
The same Workspace is exported via SAMBA to Windows and, in an extreme case,
AFS to Mac OS.
Other combinations could be
Linux - SAMBA - Linux
Linux - AFP - Linux
Mac OS - NFS - Linux
Mac OS - AFP - Mac OS
Mac OS - SMB - Linux, Mac OS, Windows
The list is incomplete (BSD and other Unix is missing),
there are other combinations of network protocols,
there are NAS boxes which mostly Linux under the hood, but
may have vendor specific tweaks.
Now we want to know, which of the combinations work.
The different clients need to test separately.
E.g. for a given server:
NFS - Linux
SMB - Linux
SMB Windows.
At this point I would agree that the old code from dir.c:
static const char *get_ident_string(void)
{
static struct strbuf sb = STRBUF_INIT;
struct utsname uts;
if (sb.len)
return sb.buf;
if (uname(&uts) < 0)
die_errno(_("failed to get kernel name and information"));
strbuf_addf(&sb, "Location %s, system %s %s %s", get_git_work_tree(),
uts.sysname, uts.release, uts.version);
return sb.buf;
}
------------------
is unneccessary picky, and the sysname should be enough:
strbuf_addf(&sb, "Location %s, system %s", get_git_work_tree(),
uts.sysname);
The old code did not find out, which network protocol that we used,
(you need to call "mount", and grep for the directory, and try to get
the FS information, which may be ext4, btrfs, smbfs, nfs....)
This is unnecessary complicated, so we endet up in using the path.
If I was a system administrator, (I sometimes am), I would set up a
bunch of Linux boxes in a similar way, so that the repo is under
/nfs/server1/projects/myproject
(and the same path is used for all Linux boxes)
The Windows machines may use something like
N:/projects/myproject
or
//server1/projects/myproject
and Mac OS may use
/Volumes/projects/myproject
(If mounted from the finder)
or
/nfs/projects/myproject
(When autofs is used)
I may have missed the discussion somewhat, could you explain why having
different uname/location combinations are not usable at your site ?
How much burden is actually put on your system, and is there a way to keep a
list of different clients ?
What I understand is that a kernel update of a Linux machine shouldn't matter,
but if a machine runs Windows or Linux should matter.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html