Re: [PATCH v7] ls-files: Add eol diagnostics

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Torsten Bögershausen <tboegi@xxxxxx> writes:

> When working in a cross-platform environment, a user wants to
> check if text files are stored normalized in the repository and if
> .gitattributes are set appropriately.
>
> Make it possible to let Git show the line endings in the index and
> in the working tree and the effective text/eol attributes.
>
> The end of line ("eolinfo") are shown like this:
> "binary"       binary file
> "text-no-eol"  text file without any EOL
> "text-lf"      text file with LF
> "text-crlf"    text file with CRLF
> "text-crlf-lf" text file with mixed line endings.
>
> The effective text/eol attribute is one of these:
> "", "-text", "text", "text=auto", "eol=lf", "eol=crlf"
>
> git ls-files --eol gives an output like this:
>
> i/text-no-eol   w/text-no-eol   attr/text=auto t/t5100/empty
> i/binary        w/binary        attr/-text     t/test-binary-2.png
> i/text-lf       w/text-lf       attr/eol=lf    t/t5100/rfc2047-info-0007
> i/text-lf       w/text-crlf     attr/eol=crlf  doit.bat
> i/text-crlf-lf  w/text-crlf-lf  attr/          locale/XX.po
>
> Note that the output is meant to be human-readable and may change.

Wait, what?  

I've been assuming that these output being designed was to be read
by machine, because this new feature is implemented as a part of the
command "ls-files", which is plumbing whose output is meant for
script consumption.

> +--eol::
> +	Show line endings ("eolinfo") and the text/eol attributes ("texteolattr") of files.
> +	"eolinfo" is the file content identification used by Git when
> +	the "text" attribute is "auto", or core.autocrlf != false.
> +
> +	"eolinfo" is either "" (when the the info is not available"), or one of "binary",
> +	"text-no-eol", "text-lf", "text-crlf" or "text-crlf-lf".
> +	The "texteolattr" can be "", "-text", "text", "text=auto", "eol=lf", "eol=crlf".
> +
> +	Both the content in the index ("i/") and the content in the working tree ("w/")
> +	are shown for regular files, followed by the "texteolattr ("attr/").
> +

Does this format well, or would the second and third paragraph be
format in a funny way?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]