Re: [PATCH] push: don't mark options of recurse-submodules for translation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ralf Thielow <ralf.thielow@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Signed-off-by: Ralf Thielow <ralf.thielow@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  builtin/push.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/builtin/push.c b/builtin/push.c
> index cc29277..8963dbd 100644
> --- a/builtin/push.c
> +++ b/builtin/push.c
> @@ -547,7 +547,7 @@ int cmd_push(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
>  		  0, CAS_OPT_NAME, &cas, N_("refname>:<expect"),
>  		  N_("require old value of ref to be at this value"),
>  		  PARSE_OPT_OPTARG, parseopt_push_cas_option },
> -		{ OPTION_CALLBACK, 0, "recurse-submodules", &recurse_submodules, N_("check|on-demand|no"),
> +		{ OPTION_CALLBACK, 0, "recurse-submodules", &recurse_submodules, "check|on-demand|no",
>  			N_("control recursive pushing of submodules"),
>  			PARSE_OPT_OPTARG, option_parse_recurse_submodules },
>  		OPT_BOOL( 0 , "thin", &thin, N_("use thin pack")),

Makes sense.  I should redo the -rc2 with this patch in.

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]