On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 01:02:50PM -0800, Shawn Pearce wrote: > I started playing around with the idea of storing references directly > in Git. Exploiting the GITLINK tree entry, we can associate a name to > any SHA-1. Gitlink entries don't imply reachability, though. I guess that doesn't matter if your ref backend says "no, really, these are the ref tips, and they are reachable". But you could not push the whole thing up to another server and expect it to hold the whole graph. Which is not strictly necessary, but to me seems like the real advantage of using git objects versus some other system. Of course, the lack of reachability has advantages, too. You can drop commits pointed to by old reflogs without rewriting the ref history. Unfortunately you cannot expunge the reflogs at all. That's good if you like audit trails. Bad if you are worried that your reflogs will grow large. :) > By storing all references in a single tree, atomic transactions are > possible. Its a simple compare-and-swap of a single 40 byte SHA-1. > This of course leads to a bootstrapping problem, where do we store the > 40 byte SHA-1? For this example its just $GIT_DIR/refs/txn/committed > as a classical loose reference. Somehow putting it inside `refs/` seems weird to me, in an infinite recursion kind of way. I would have picked $GIT_DIR/REFSTREE or something. But that is a minor point. > Configuration: > > [core] > repositoryformatversion = 1 > [extensions] > refsBackendType = RefTree The semantics of extensions config keys are open-ended. The formatVersion=1 spec only says "if there is a key you don't know about, then you may not proceed". Now we're defining a refsBackendType extension. It probably makes sense to write up a few rules (e.g., is RefTree case-sensitive?). -Peff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html