Re: [PATCH 0/8] Rerolling sb/submodule-parallel-fetch for the time after 2.7

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Johannes Sixt <j6t@xxxxxxxx> writes:

> Am 14.12.2015 um 20:37 schrieb Stefan Beller:
>> I am sending out a new version for replacing sb/submodule-parallel-fetch for
>> the time after the 2.7 release.
>>
>> The content are
>>   * all patches as in the branch sb/submodule-parallel-fetch
>>   * inlcuding the fixups as suggested by Hannes,
>>   * write a message to the debug log for better testing and debugging purposes
>>    (a patch cherry picked from the series which is supposed to build on top of this)
>>
>> The patches themselves were rebased such that there are no fixup commits
>> any more, but we get things right the first time.
>>
>> The commit message of "run-command: add an asynchronous parallel child processor"
>> has slightly been updated to mention the fact that we don't want to use waitpid(-1)
>> but rather use the assumption of child's stderr living as long as the child itself.
>
> Thanks! I rebased a version of sb/submodule-parallel-fetch that
> includes my suggested improvements, and the result is identical to
> this series except for the trace output mentioned in the last bullet
> point.
>
> With or without addressing my note about the commit message in 6/8:
>
> Acked-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@xxxxxxxx>

Thanks, both.  This round does look very clean to build on top.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]