Re: [PATCH v6] blame: add support for --[no-]progress option

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 5:57 PM, Edmundo Carmona Antoranz
<eantoranz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> +       if (incremental || (output_option & OUTPUT_PORCELAIN)) {
> +               if (show_progress > 0)
> +                       die("--progress can't be used with --incremental or porcelain formats");
> +               show_progress = 0;
> +       } else if (show_progress < 0)
> +               show_progress = isatty(2);
> +

I think I took care of all the comments from Eric gracefully. Hope
that block is ok for detection of mutually exclusivity related to
--progress.

Cheers!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]