Re: [PATCH v2] add test to demonstrate that shallow recursive clones fail

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Stefan Beller <sbeller@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Did you have any reason to pick . specifically or are we welcome to bikeshed
> why a colon might be better? (or ":", "?", "[", "\", "^", "~", SP, or TAB)
>
> We could use [id]c78f7b5ed9dc1c6edc8db06ac65860151d54fd07
> or [const]c78f7b5ed9dc1c6edc8db06ac65860151d54fd07 ?

As to the bikeshedding, I kind of like the above.

    [object:c78f7b5ed9dc1c6edc8db06ac65860151d54fd07]

would be a more natural way to use the pairwise magic characters
like [], I suspect.

Thanks.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]