Re: Bug: Incorrect stripping of the [PATCH] prefix in git-am

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:

> The "[]" convention is a microformat used by Linux kernel folks. So it's
> not "whoops, we are stripping stuff not added by git". It is respecting
> a microformat used by the tool's authors.
>
> That being said, if we were choosing a default from scratch today, it
> might go the other way. But we aren't, and we have to deal with the
> burden of breaking existing scripts by flipping it.

And I do think it no longer is sensible to expect that it still is
kernel-only convention.  Any project that uses e-mail based workflow
with Git have known how "[]" microformat works, may even have taken
advantage of it to build their workflow around it, and flipping the
default will only hurt them.

A project that chooses not to follow the convention can easily tweak
a knob to keep using different conventions, so I do not see anything
to change here.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]