Re: [RFC/PATCH] config: add core.trustmtime

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Maybe I'm missing some really common breakage with st_mtime on some
> system, but having a feature the user explicitly enables turn itself
> off and doing FS-testing that takes 10 seconds when it's enabled seems
> like the wrong default to me.
>
> We don't do it with core.fileMode, core.ignorecase or core.trustctime
> or core.symlinks. Do we really need to be treating this differently?

I share the exact thought.  I was looking the other way when
untracked-cache was done originally ;-), and I would also want to
know the answers to the above questions.

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]