Re: [PATCH v3] blame: add support for --[no-]progress option

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 11:12 PM, Edmundo Carmona Antoranz
<eantoranz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> +struct progress_info {
> +       struct progress *progress;
> +       int blamed_lines;
> +};
> +

This is valid, right? Adding 2 more parameters to found_guilty_entry()
sounded like an overkill so I joined them into a new struct.

Thanks in advance.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]