Re: [PATCH v1] blame: add support for --[no-]progress option

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 11:27 PM, Edmundo Carmona Antoranz
<eantoranz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> -static void assign_blame(struct scoreboard *sb, int opt)
> +static void assign_blame(struct scoreboard *sb, int opt, int show_progress)
>
> Would it be better to include show_progress as a binary flag in opt
> instead of a separate variable?

What is the point of having 'global' variable and not using it as such?

I'm sending a second version of the patch where I'm taking care of
most of my previous comments. Let's hope that one holds water.

Thanks in advance.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]