Re: [PATCH v2] blame: avoid checking if a file exists on the working tree if a revision is provided

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 5:37 PM, Edmundo Carmona Antoranz
<eantoranz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> So, do I forget about the blame patch (given that I'm not fixing an
> advertised syntax, even if it's supported) and fix annotate instead or
> do I fix both? And if I should swing for both, do I create a single
> patch or a chain of two patches, one for each builtin?

Actually, cmd_annotate will call cmd_blame so this patch actually
fixes annotate as well (nice unintended consequence).

So I guess it will be a single patch. Let me work on the tests and
then I'll send a patch that will hopefully cover all raised points.

Cheers!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]