Re: [PATCH v1] blame: avoid checking if a file exists on the working tree if a revision is provided

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 7:07 PM, Edmundo Carmona Antoranz
<eantoranz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> -               if (!file_exists(path))
> -                       die_errno("cannot stat path '%s'", path);

Two things:
1
What I would love to do is check if revisions were provided. Something like:

if (no_revisions() && !file_exists(path))
    die_errno("cannot stat path '%s'", path);

_but_ revisions are set up a little bit later. I don't know right now
if I could just move it up (I don't think it would be that simple
because I see there's some messing up with argv and argc in that 'if'
that encloses the lines I'm removing). Maybe it would make sense to
move the check for file existence to _after_ revisions have been set
up? Even without the check for revisions, it's behaving kind of the
way I mean it to. But I'm sure it'd be more elegant if I checked if
revisions were provided.

2 It makes sense to create test cases for this patch, right?

Looking forward to your comments. Thanks in advance.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]