On 12/11/15 05:27, Torsten Bögershausen wrote:
>>Ah. OK, so %ld for long and %lld for long long, I suppose.
> Only if you have a system that's support it.
>
> Linux does, Windows not.
Sure, but I was speculating specifically about Eric's mac (which I
have no experience with).
>
>> Hmm, not that it matters, but I wonder what the PRId64 macro is. ;-)
> It's "I64d" for Windows, and "lld" for all Gnu based systems and others,
[On Gnu systems, I believe it is %lld on 32-bit and %ld on 64-bit.]
Again, I was commenting on Eric's mac, which _seems_ to allow
the use of both %ld and %lld when printing 64-bit integers, so
which does it choose for PRId64 ...
>
> When you do printf("%lld %ld", long_long_var, long_var),
> the "printf runtime" under Windows will treat "%lld" as "%ld", and print
> the lower part of long_long_var.
> And will not pull a long long from stack, but a long, resulting i all kinds of confusion
>
> So whenever a long long is printed, I can warmly recommend to use
>
> PRId64
Indeed.
ATB,
Ramsay Jones
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html