Re: [PATCH 0/5] Use watchman to reduce index refresh time

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2015-11-09 at 21:06 +0100, Christian Couder wrote:
> Using David's series I get worse results than all of the above but I
> guess it's because his series is based on an ancient git version
> (v2.0.0-rc0).

My more-recent series is on top of 2.4, but (for webkit):
mine: 0m0.206s 
duy's: 0m0.107s

However, I'm getting occasional index-helper segfaults due to
istate->last_update being NULL.  (I'm using Duy's  index-helper branch
from his github + this patchset + a function signature fix due to a
newer version of libwatchman).  I haven't looked into why this is --
maybe accidentally mixing git versions while testing?  

Also, after messing around for a while (on Duy's branch), I ended up in
a state where git status would take ~2.5s every time.  The index helper
was alive but evidently not working right.  Killing and restarting it
worked.  Actually, I think I can repro this more easily: "git rm
Changelog" seems to put the index-helper into this state.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]