On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 8:31 AM, Jeremy Morton <admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> It's recently come to my attention that the "git alias" config functionality
> ignores all aliases that would override existing Git commands. This seems
> like a bad idea to me.
This ensures that the plumbing commands always work as expected.
As scripts *should* only use plumbing commands, the scripts should
work with high probability despite all the crazy user configuration/aliases.
>
> For example, I wanted to setup "git clone" to automatically act as "git
> clone --recursive". Sure I could do it in the shell, but it's more of a
> pain - any tutorial I set up about doing it would have to worry about what
> shell the user was using - and if you're going to make that argument, why
> have "git alias" at all? It can all be done from the shell.
I think the git way for your example would be to configure git to include that
option by default, something like
git config --global submodules.recursiveClone yes
though I was skimming through the man page of git config and did not find
that option there. I guess it's missing.
>
> Obviously I could also use a different alias that wasn't an existing Git
> command for this behaviour, but that would rather defeat the point: I want
> "git clone" to have different functionality. If I remembered to use a
> different Git command, I might as well remember to type "git clone
> --recursive". Also, if a future Git command were introduced with the same
> name as my alias, my alias's functionality would suddenly be ignored, giving
> unexpected behaviour.
>
> The reasoning behind this that it's "to avoid confusion and troubles with
> script usage" seems to be at odds with the general Git mentality that the
> user is given lots of power, and if they screw it up it's basically just
> user error.
For scripting the plumbing commands are recommended. The plumbing commands
usually cannot be configured to do crazy stuff.
> For example, Git doesn't *have* to allow you to rebase. It's a
> potentially dangerous operation, so why is it allowed? It might "cause
> confusion and troubles".
Git doesn't try to hide its complexity from the users. And if a user would need
to hack their way around to get rebasing working again, might also
"cause confusion
and troubles".
>
> On the other hand, by disallowing the overriding of existing Git commands
> through aliases you are preventing a lot of useful functionality that those
> aliases might be used for.
>
> So I think you should either allow Git aliases to override existing Git
> commands by default, or at least provide a config option that allows the
> user to say that this should happen.
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Jeremy Morton (Jez)
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html