Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Up to now the number printed was calculated assuming that the > current revision to test is bad. Given that it's not possible > that this always matches the number of suspicious revs if the > current one is good, the maximum of both is taken now. > > Moreover I think the number printed was always one to high, > this is fixed, too. I know you mean well, but is it really worth an extra rev-list for this off-by-one, I wonder? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html